That’s actually really cool for tasks filled with simple procedures and formality, though I wouldn’t want to be the human who has to parse machine-written occasionally-falsely-confident English so I’d hope people keep the author’s note in mind:
([personal assistant; ChatGPT] who is often wrong - need to read their work thoroughly)
I remember having arguments about what the future of interoperability standards would be - XML? JSON? SGML? How would government and business communicate? The answer apparently is AI written pseudo-English.
I appreciate the sentiment, but I don’t see anything pseudo about either option presented in the article? Are you expecting future generators to devolve from this?
And now imagine the other side was also ChatGPT. If they would train it with all laws, legal commentaries and court decisions of a country, you could even use ChatGPT as a judge. Brave New World.
That’s actually really cool for tasks filled with simple procedures and formality, though I wouldn’t want to be the human who has to parse machine-written occasionally-falsely-confident English so I’d hope people keep the author’s note in mind:
We’re probably already doomed to have chat bots on both ends of the conversation.
I remember having arguments about what the future of interoperability standards would be - XML? JSON? SGML? How would government and business communicate? The answer apparently is AI written pseudo-English.
I appreciate the sentiment, but I don’t see anything pseudo about either option presented in the article? Are you expecting future generators to devolve from this?
They could! It happened with a pair of Facebook chatbots back in 2017 when the parameters of both models were allowed to float.
And I mean, why not? If it’s more efficient, more power to ’em.
TBH, I’d love a reliable fact extraction for most of my incoming correspondence.
The note is warranted if it was a completely automated correspondence. Here the text was verified by the human.
This is more like “I have all the facts just don’t feel like coming up with a formal text for it”.
And now imagine the other side was also ChatGPT. If they would train it with all laws, legal commentaries and court decisions of a country, you could even use ChatGPT as a judge. Brave New World.