1. 14
  1.  

  2. 4

    I’m beginning to think I should have named this series “Restricting function arguments in Elm”

    I do not know to what extent the author is joking, but that would have been, and would still be, a spectacularly good name. Capturing an abstractish concept in a simple sentence that explains what someone would use it for? Good stuff that we could always do with more of.

    1. 4

      Author here. Yep, agreed. I started out the series thinking I’d learn about less trivial use cases of certain types only to find out that they all converged on the same idea of restricting function arguments.