1. 10
  1.  

  2. 3

    FEATURE CREEP

    1. 6

      THIS.

      IS.

      EMACS.

      Seriously, though, if you think these are worrying showing signs of feature creep in Emacs, you haven’t been paying attention to Emacs for the last 30 years. We don’t just have feature creep; we have feature galloping, and we like it that way.

      1. 4

        As a huge emacs user, I see feature creep in emacs as similar to saying there’s feature creep in golang every time someone writes a library.

        These are merely applications that are being enabled by the emacs runtime, not features of an individual application.

        1. 2

          Except unlike golang, emacs has a habit of including unnecessary features, tempting people to do things like display a web browser in their text editor.

          As to whether that’s useful or useless, that’s up to you!

        2. 3

          I would make the email client feature creep joke but I’m sure it’s already a reality

          1. 1

            Emacs is a GNU Lisp Machine emulated in software, pretending to be a text editor.

        3. 3

          Yet another Webkit instance. I’m definitely not going back to emacs. I can bet that it will divert from mainstream quickly and might not get prompt security patches applied.

          1. 3

            Hurts. Good thing mg(1) has our backs!

          2. 1

            I don’t use Emacs (I’ve tried to switch multiple times over the past 20+ years and it’s never quite stuck), but I’m always in awe of how a 40-year old text editor is still under heavy development and remaining relevant in a world of text editors written in Javascript and running in a bloated web browser container (I’m looking at you Atom and Visual Studio Code).

            Hrm. I wonder if it’s possible to run Cloud9 inside Emacs? I’m guessing probably