Duplicate of https://lobste.rs/s/zjug8x/fast_kernel_headers_tree
I suggest this be merged instead of moderated away since the ZDNet article has substantially more information than its LWN counterpart.
FWIW this article is just summarizing the RFC linked by the LWN article.
there’s a flag for that… “already posted”
I did not want to do that, since I think @strugee is right that this should be merged.
“The mess we create trying to work around issues in C :)” He’s not wrong. This is one reason why there are efforts afoot to make Rust Linux’s second language.
“The mess we create trying to work around issues in C :)”
He’s not wrong. This is one reason why there are efforts afoot to make Rust Linux’s second language.
They are adding rust to linux in order to improve its compile times? … :)
Wait till they find out how much macros in rust can increaseimprove your compile time ;) (AFAIK the linux kernel has some macros for specific structures.)
Duplicate of https://lobste.rs/s/zjug8x/fast_kernel_headers_tree
I suggest this be merged instead of moderated away since the ZDNet article has substantially more information than its LWN counterpart.
FWIW this article is just summarizing the RFC linked by the LWN article.
there’s a flag for that… “already posted”
I did not want to do that, since I think @strugee is right that this should be merged.
They are adding rust to linux in order to improve its compile times? … :)
Wait till they find out how much macros in rust can
increaseimprove your compile time ;) (AFAIK the linux kernel has some macros for specific structures.)