Yes, obviously. It is meant more in the sense of “without EC2 instances” or something similar, but I think it would have ended up to be too confusing for a title, there is already too much AWS jargon in it.
On a side note, if the reason on why I posted this was not clear: I didn’t posted this for the chat application per se (it is not quite usable in a real world scenario), but because I thought it was a nice example on how Amazon Web Services can work together in clever ways. This was also the purpose of the project, to “create a multi-user, dynamic web application without using EC2 or resorting to hacks”.
alternative title: How to Use Amazon Web Services together in clever ways
alternative title: Create multi-user dynamic web application in AWS without EC2
Current title is not very strong, is there no way to add a link description?
As much as I enjoy hating AWS, and although they’ve done their normal best to screw lambda up, I have to admit that function-application-as-a-service is a pretty freaking sweet concept. Even the janky stockholm-syndrome flop-sweat half-tools don’t sink it yet.
Just because someone else is running them doesn’t mean it’s “without servers.”
Yes, obviously. It is meant more in the sense of “without EC2 instances” or something similar, but I think it would have ended up to be too confusing for a title, there is already too much AWS jargon in it.
On a side note, if the reason on why I posted this was not clear: I didn’t posted this for the chat application per se (it is not quite usable in a real world scenario), but because I thought it was a nice example on how Amazon Web Services can work together in clever ways. This was also the purpose of the project, to “create a multi-user, dynamic web application without using EC2 or resorting to hacks”.
alternative title: How to Use Amazon Web Services together in clever ways alternative title: Create multi-user dynamic web application in AWS without EC2
Current title is not very strong, is there no way to add a link description?
As much as I enjoy hating AWS, and although they’ve done their normal best to screw lambda up, I have to admit that function-application-as-a-service is a pretty freaking sweet concept. Even the janky stockholm-syndrome flop-sweat half-tools don’t sink it yet.
‘Only’