1. 9
  1.  

  2. 4

    This is still pure gold. To the point and full of sarcasm.

    1. 3

      … or one can simply link to the source ;^)

      1. 1

        True, my bad ;-).

        edit: .. but still the same glory in a more verbose manner.

      2. 2

        BTW, this is clearly, not an up-to-date Linux kernel coding style (see a direct link above/below), but a SLURM coding style, based on an abridged version of the former.

        1. 1

          The original still contains the same glory though, it is just in a more verbose manner ;-)