1. 19
  1.  

  2. 5

    I learned of this implementation’s existence because it was mentioned in a new SRFI. It’s hosted on Chibi (but can theoretically be run on any R7RS small implementation). Looks pretty cool, and it even comes with a syntax-case implementation, which perhaps we could steal for a CHICKEN egg :)

    1. 3

      Can you ELI5 how it makes sense for one scheme implementation to require a second one? Couldn’t I just use Chibi instead of this?

      1. 1

        I guess a good example would be Racket running on Chez Scheme; an implementation can offer new syntax and experiment with other new features while leveraging the runtime and tooling of another implementation. This is also how new implementations get bootstrapped, but I think for this particular one the goal is more to be a clean (in their words “sane”) implementation of Scheme which makes it easy to add reference implementations of new SRFI libraries (which is what it’s being used for right now).

    2. 3

      OK I can honestly say that this is the only programming language I have ever seen where despite clicking several levels deep through link nests I have yet to come upon an actual example of the syntax of this variant or what makes it different.

      1. 3

        It says it’s an implementation of R7RS scheme, so any scheme code you’ve seen before would be literally identical?

        I’m not sure you correctly parsed what this project is. It’s not a new language. It’s an implementation of an existing one.

        1. 1

          You’re right. I hadn’t. Thanks for pointing that out.

          1. 2

            No problem. 🙂

            Have you ever tried Scheme?

            1. 2

              I have! I got through the first 1/3 or so of SICP using MIT Scheme, and I’ve played off and on with Racket, Chicken Scheme and, back in the dark ages when dinos roamed the earth, I ported Scheme48 to Windows as part of my day job :)

              LISP like languages are a thing I have wanted to explore in more depth for a long time, but lately I’m cutting back on that kind of thing a lot in favor of honing my important skills for $dayjob :)

              Someday!