The bad section only contains some nitpicks about the syntax, so that’s a glowing review, right?
(Either that, or the author didn’t actually delve deep enough for any substantial criticism. Considering there’s no discussion on use expressions, (and since I don’t see them in their code), I suspect the latter.)
Still, great to see people trying out Gleam! It’s a language I also find very compelling in principle, though in practice more as a quasi-Go replacement, not for Javascript work.
The bad section only contains some nitpicks about the syntax, so that’s a glowing review, right?
(Either that, or the author didn’t actually delve deep enough for any substantial criticism. Considering there’s no discussion on use expressions, (and since I don’t see them in their code), I suspect the latter.)
Still, great to see people trying out Gleam! It’s a language I also find very compelling in principle, though in practice more as a quasi-Go replacement, not for Javascript work.