“In what is surely either a case of Silicon Valley tit-for-tat or the result of a bad mobile phone connection to Cupertino, Apple responded by acquiring Strange Loop to bolster enterprise Om.”
This is not the title of the actual article.
Does that make the statement any less true?
I don’t know if the title you chose is true, it implies being able to understand the motivations of others. But it also doens’t matter if it is true or not, I think it is disrespectful of the author to change their title.
It does seem to be close to the title of one of the sections, “IBM & StrongLoop: Enterprise-grade Node”.
Specifically what grinds my gears about it is that it ascribes a motivation to someone whom we cannot actually know their motivation.
I work for IBM. I know the motivation.