1. 25
  1.  

  2. 23

    At each new major version of Redis what the command does will change completely, only a set of rules will be fixed:

    1. It can’t do anything technologically useful.

    Big mistake, developers are gonna start relying on lolwut to get the major version of redis

    1. 3

      Cute! And this

      computers are about humans, and […] it is not possible to reason in an aseptic way just thinking at the technological implications

      is very well put. ❤

      1. 3
        1. It can’t do anything technologically useful.
        2. It should be fast at doing what it does, so that it is safe to call LOLWUT on production instances.
        3. The output should be entertaining in some way.

        This is irritating to all of us with open PRs for real improvements, bugfixes, and enhancements that are starved for attention.

        Because of the master-slave fiasco and intense work involved with scrubbing everything, he now needs a diversion to like working on his own project again? That’s great, it’s over – now let’s get back to brass tacks and fix defects, finally finish replication enhancements now being worked on for 2 years, finally wrap up streams (Salvatore’s pet project nobody asked for), and improve performance to play catch-up with other datastores.

        1. 30

          Or, antirez can spend his time as he sees fit, just like any other FOSS maintainer.

          1. 9

            I’m sorry your PRs weren’t getting attention, but it was very important to change a word and the negative discourse associated with that (and this resulting cry for help) were much more critical to spend cycles on.

            You can’t prioritize software quality over Twitter grumping, that’d be silly.

            1. 6

              I haven’t followed the details of the master-slave kerfuffle, but it seems to be simply a failure of community management. As a lazy maintainer, it seems like the proper route is just to say “I acknowledge that people feel so strongly about this sort of terminology and will happily accept PR’s to fix the problem; this seems like a good candidate for new contributors to get their feet wet with” and link to a connected issue tracker.

              Then after a year or two of no nobody submitting fixes you close the issue as WONTFIX and get on with life.

              Edit: That said, taking a break from the stuff you have to do and making something functioning, silly and completely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things can be deeply satisfying. Sometimes you need that sort of thing to remind us why we love doing what we do.

              1. 3

                Yeah, I still don’t understand how Twitter discussions can have this impact on people’s lives.

                Together with just some wording used since the beginning of IT. So why can’t words acquire new meanings? Isn’t that the definition of a living language?

                1. 3

                  Because the people are suffering from some kind of delusion.

                  I would like to see the budding young DBA-to-be who veered off IT/CS/STEM because he or she got triggered by the word “slave”.

                  Or even honest testimonies along the lines of “I was always interested in code, but I’d suffer immense panic attacks when I saw the word ‘blacklist’. I’m a Person of Color so this touches me deeply. The maintainer was kind enough to rename it (we settled on disallowlist) and now I commit a few times a year to the project. I have never felt this included and welcome in my life. Best of all? No one even complained about the broken APIs after the rename!”

                  1. 1

                    What I find weird is the “matter of fact” tone plus many contributors (not necessarily the maintainer) caving in right away, as if they also felt dirty while typing “git push - u origin master” or felt all the weight of worldwide injustices when the main DB switched to the “slave” one. I was relieved reading sane supporters though.

                  2. 2

                    Yes words do this constantly. But only in a negative way. Negative connotations tend to hang around. That’s why using these words is problematic. Also impractical, since you’d have to add a disclaimer that you mean the word in the new sense not the broadly known old one. If someone knows an example of some words changing from negative to positive connotations I’d be happy to hear about this.

                    For the current example I honestly don’t understand the quarrels people have. Why is dropping language that’s strongly tied to a history of colonisation and oppression a bad thing? Especially when other words can describe the same architectural pattern as accurately as the original words?

                    And every programmer knows that choice of words is important, we shouldn’t use them too lightly.

                    To turn the question around: So why can’t concepts get new names if the old ones are problematic?

                    1. 7

                      If someone knows an example of some words changing from negative to positive connotations I’d be happy to hear about this.

                      • Fun - to cheat or hoax
                      • Smart - a sharp stinging pain
                      • Fond - a fool
                      1. 4

                        “Nice” is one of such words. It meant foolish and silly.

                        The problem isn’t much about naming by itself: you want to use “disallowedList” and “allowedList”? Want to use “primary” and “replica”? Want to use “kaka” and “popo”, do as you wish. But going ahead and picking a project at seemingly random and force them to change words that have been picked as they are (or used to be) the standard name of those elements in a somewhat aggressive way then that’s where I’m drawing the line.

                        Or creating chaos on the issues section or on social media, extending the use of such standard words to the morals of the maintainers, that’s totally disgusting and absolutely useless.

                        What I find even more shocking isn’t the vocal part that enjoys stirring up drama for whatever reason (there is clearly a reason why these groups are doing this and it cannot be to make the tech world a friendlier place, that’s for sure) but it is people who just shrugs them off or who, just like you, now supports their point because they are somewhat technically correct.

                        Let’s start harassing all Spanish speaker developers who use the word “negro” for their black elements, how about the word “sheet” that reads as poo in Swedish, how about the word “pitch” that is extremely similar to a bad word in some Slavic languages, and “git”?

                        That is and would be dumb to do. Also, why is the “American” morality be pushed down the throats of the rest of the world? Just because they still cannot cope with their past, is that a good reason to force everyone to change their behaviour?

                        1. 3

                          I share the idea that this debate is totally dumb. There were intellectuals in the 90s that brought this up with Intel and IDE controllers. PATA went away and that debate didn’t matter, but now we see the same bullshit arising again.

                          The most vocal people in this fight are extremely childish and troll/harass developers. That’s not right. If you take a reasonable stance, you’re a racist.

                          I’m tired of outrage culture.

                          I highly recommend Brendan O’Neil’s speech on offence: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BtWrljX9HRA

                          and I also recommend the original post about this debate with ver well reasoned arguments:

                          http://antirez.com/news/122

                          1. 2

                            “In fact, pretty much every leap forward in history… pretty much every freedom we enjoy is a product of individuals having given offense. Having offended against the orthodoxies of their age. Offensiveness is not something we have to begrudgingly accept. Offensiveness is the motor of human progress.”

                            I’ll add the people against offending folks are defending beliefs created by offending folks ranging from speech to progress. Just like he said. They wouldn’t exist if their rules were enforced by the orthodoxy of the day when people were trying to get those reforms started. So, they glorify the reformers who offended piles of people creating their current belief systems but say nobody is allowed to offend their orthodoxies suggesting alternative systems. Double standards are a common sign of bullshit.

                            Edit: Oh, wait, he just said that, too, later in the speech. I’m still watching it.

                          2. 2

                            how about the word “sheet” that reads as poo in Swedish

                            I don’t want to get into the broader discussion again, but I speak fluent Swedish; sheet /ʃiːt/ does not look or sound like skit /ˈɧiːt/.

                            1. 1

                              Can’t argue with you, I just looked up English words which sounded/looked like bad words in other languages. Maybe they had something specific in mind, don’t know :)

                            2. 2

                              IMNSHO the use of the word “slave” isn’t as simple as being “American”. The African slaves were often sold off by their own chieftains, and different types of slavery have existed and (may be argued to) exist around the world.

                              The point about stirring up shit is more relevant. These are homonyms; a word that sounds the same or is spelled the same as another can have different meanings, as rhe examples above.

                              The slave in an IT or mechanical context simply isn’t the same type of slave that picked cotton in the southern states.

                              I’m sure there are plenty of Slavic lobsters here, but I haven’t read a single comment, here or elsewhere, of one of them being triggered by the etymology of that word.

                              1. 2

                                Exactly and that’s because on a global platform, filled with people from all around the world, with absolutely different cultures and languages, people (including myself) are not going to ruin someone else’s day just because they used a word which was/sound/looks/is derogatory in my own language on something totally unrelated.

                                If there was something totally unacceptable, one could look into why such a word was chosen or if it was intended at all, inform them privately of the thing (if, say, they are interested in being known in those countries) and move on. Not starting a debate about something pretty much every single culture in the world has had.

                                This seems to come from the wave of social justice which is plaguing certain countries, where one is offended for someone else and wants to be their saviour, while making everyone more miserable in the process, probably to achieve a “victory” for humanity or just themselves.

                                1. 1

                                  It’s not specifically American at all. Human trafficking rings (a polite euphemism for ‘selling people into slavery’) are still being fought by law enforcement around the world today.

                                  I’m sure there are plenty of Slavic lobsters here, but I haven’t read a single comment, here or elsewhere, of one of them being triggered by the etymology of that word.

                                  Reasonable people aren’t triggered by thousand-year-old etymology.

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_trafficking#Revenue indicates $150 billion/year in revenue derived from forced labor, globally. Consider that your users might actually include someone who has been enslaved and would rather not be reminded of it at work.

                                  1. 2

                                    Yet your example is hypothetical. There might actually be someone. People shouldn’t be triggered by homonyms at all.

                                    Maybe the next hill to die on is killing or terminating child processes. Many women need to have late abortions and be reminded at work of infanticide.

                                    This will never stop unless maintainers put their foot down and say that messing around with APIs because a vocal minority bullies them is not ok.

                                    The case would be stronger if the proponents of this had personal experience to share, or other evidence to back it up. Even then, we’re talking about software, not people. Better would be to donate to Amnesty or do something else than change every word and rewrite all the dictionaries.

                                    1. 1

                                      People shouldn’t be triggered by homonyms at all.

                                      If only we got a choice about what trauma the world inflicted on us.

                                      Maybe the next hill to die on is killing or terminating child processes

                                      Maybe. But since nobody has, to my knowledge, brought it up - you are raising a ridiculous straw-man (straw-person, ha).

                                      This will never stop unless maintainers put their foot down and say that messing around with APIs because a vocal minority bullies them is not ok.

                                      Of the things that might stop it, that seems like one of the least likely to work.

                                      As noted elsewhere in the thread, “Feel free to submit a complete PR, including all documentation updates” is more than enough to get them to leave you alone. In the unlikely event that someone cares enough to actually do the work, I’d suggest you’ve just gained a hardworking co-contributor.

                                2. 1

                                  Please do not conflate my questions or position with abusive behaviour towards others. My post was not about that. I haven’t asked you to do anything, nor have I endorsed abusive behaviour by others. If my questions or position causes so much grief and anger maybe it’s worth exploring why that is the case?

                                  Please relax, there’s no need for this aggravating tone here.

                                  1. 1

                                    Mmm what?