You could argue that it was initiated in ‘09. Or completed in ‘10. ‘97 is so far from a typo relative to either of those that it could practically only be a hallucination. But I think I’ll just flag it “spam”.
Eh. Yours would be more accurate. But “spam” works for me. Their claim:
Oracle obtained the JavaScript brand after acquiring Sun Microsystems in 1997.
Is so completely outlandish that “spam” makes sense, IMO. There’s no universe I can imagine in which that’s a good-faith statement, anyway. And “spam” seems to cover that particular sort of bad faith pretty well.
Uh, what? I’m sensing LLM hallucination.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript#Trademark
Exactly - Oracle bought Sun in ’09, not ’97
You could argue that it was initiated in ‘09. Or completed in ‘10. ‘97 is so far from a typo relative to either of those that it could practically only be a hallucination. But I think I’ll just flag it “spam”.
Do we need a flag “Hallucination” ?
Eh. Yours would be more accurate. But “spam” works for me. Their claim:
Is so completely outlandish that “spam” makes sense, IMO. There’s no universe I can imagine in which that’s a good-faith statement, anyway. And “spam” seems to cover that particular sort of bad faith pretty well.