Interesting solution, though I think the problem here is that most of these social media giants provide API access via OAuth authorization schemes (insofar as I know, this is the only way most of these bots could possibly post on social media) allowing non-humans to post on behalf of the human. This largely isn’t for nefarious purposes either–think of all of the cross-app integrations that exist out there that post an update to your Facebook whenever you’ve met a personal running goal or something similar.
So provided a human has generated personal access tokens or OAuth-authorized credentials, a non-human would be able to act on the behalf of the human and post any content it wanted to.
Thinking about the use case of automated users (non-nefarious bots), one approach would be to label those accounts explicitly, like Slack does when you use a Slack bot.
I haven’t been on Facebook in awhile, but if I remember correctly this is already implemented in Facebook.
Near the time stamp there (used to be) a string that linked back to a website for an app-originated update.
Mainly because it is new and people seem to trust proton mail. In my mind a release from a trusted company is noteworthy.
This can’t be that new… I’ve been using ProtonVPN for months now.
Edit: They graduated out of beta on 20 June 2017 according to this article.
You’re not missing something and I’m not really advertising it but ok. The post was simply meant to be informative with regards to a prominent email service offering a VPN service as well.
As someone who is just starting to get into a software-related field, I found this very helpful. Especially since, typically people my age tend to let the interviewers drive the interview and fail to ask any question.
I always knew it was important to ask questions, but I never knew what questions to ask. Thanks!
Are people still surprised by stories like this?