1. 2

    raco exe + chez will be wonderful!

    1. 1

      what’s the advantage in having that?

      1. 1

        Chez has a better compiler than Racket. It’s faster, and has a simpler architecture (from what I can tell). Some more details here: https://blog.racket-lang.org/2018/01/racket-on-chez-status.html

        1. 1

          Have you tried compiling chez in a repeatable manner, that is delivered as an executable? I got stuck for quite a while dealing with all their boot files - raco exe working would mean I don’t need to do that.

      1. 3

        Is the only difference between Guix and Nix the language? I know Nix is more mature and has a bigger community with more packages, but I don’t see any user-facing changes between the two.

        1. 4

          I guess there are many differences? One important one is the license. The FSF prefers Guix and GuixSD over Nix and NixOS.

          1. 1

            that’s…not really…a difference in the technology

            1. 3

              Oh, you wanted only technological differences? Sorry about that. :)

          2. 3

            Guix is or was based on the Nix daemon and essentially just a fork, substituting the Nix language for scheme, plus the requirements for packaging. This was several years ago now, it may have diverged further.

          1. 3

            “Code is not important. Principles are not important. Rules are not important. People are important.”

            The guy that says that principles and rules are not important than gives the principle/rule that people are important. In a professional setting the only thing that matters is the problem and solving it, not the people, code, tools, etc. they’re all mutable.