1. 3

    There is no real intelligence to it.

    While I understand the motivation behind that claim, I find ‘real intelligence’ to be an almost equally vague term as ‘artificial intelligence’.

    1. 1

      Just because you can’t define a term with acceptable precision doesn’t mean you can’t recognize things it doesn’t apply to. For the purposes of this discussion, an intuitive understanding is plenty.

    1. 2

      Too bad it remains unclear how the results will be made accessible and usable for the public. E.g. which data, which license? Also, I would hope that additional languages follow soon.