1. 14

    I have NFI how you can look at Cloudflare’s behaviour and be mad because they’re not doing enough censorship. There are no circumstances where networking infrastructure providers should be playing the part of thought police. It’s disgusting.

    1. 2

      In that case, would you mind hosting my website for me (free, of course)? Or are you some kind of censor?

      1. 4

        Much as domestic budgeting doesn’t have much to teach national budgeting, my obligations to you differ from the those of a corporation that handles a percentage of the world’s Internet traffic.

        1. 3

          I guess it’s wishful thinking on my part (hoping for enough competition that CF don’t hold undue power).

          Perhaps DDOS protection is a ‘natural monopoly’, like other capital-intensive works. Something to think about.

        2. 1

          Pretty sure cloudflare will ask you to move to enterprise plan if you have high non-ddos bandwidth. Its not about money or profit.

          1. 4

            I’m doing 40gb/hr out and they haven’t complained yet.

            They don’t care about outbound, because bulk bandwidth is only purchased in symmetric amounts, and they need high inbound for DDOS protection, so the outbound is effectively free (to them).

      1. 3

        What about DDOS protection? Its their main feature. Are there any alternatives for it?

        1. 3

          Do you have any plans for WebExtensions support? Would be the best browser.

          1. 1

            This is a very good question. To be honest, I personally don’t know enough about WebExtensions. My gut feeling is that they are way too limited compared to what Next offers. But that would not stop us from supporting them, for the sake of compatibility.

            What would be interesting to collect is the most popular non-trivial WebExtensions out there.

            1. 2

              There are lots of situational/not popular webexensions people use, its impossible to move them all to next as lisp extensions (or whatever exension it supports) unless it will become a mainstream browser.

          1. 2

            Keeping in mind that WebExtensions API is now currently supported by both Chromium and Firefox, what’s stopping you from packaging it for Firefox too?

            I suppose AMO (addons.mozilla.org) wouldn’t have such restrictive policy to prevent your addon from being shown.

            Personally, I would love to see that combined with Sublime/VSCode/Vivaldi-esque navigation over tabs (I have dozens or hundreds open in trees) as quick switcher.

            1. 1

              Personally, I would love to see that combined with Sublime/VSCode/Vivaldi-esque navigation over tabs (I have dozens or hundreds open in trees) as quick switcher.

              Can you please explain it more in details? I think this extension is quite similar to what you described: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/quick-tabs/jnjfeinjfmenlddahdjdmgpbokiacbbb?hl=en

              Firefox version is in plans.

              Thank you for your feedback.