1. 5
    1. They want to move DNS to Cloudflare. I’m sure there’s still hot debates happening on mailing lists. This also means the plan isn’t final.
    2. They want to change the default behavior. People who care can opt-out. I’d say majority of their users (non tech savvy) don’t even know what DNS is and would benefit from using Cloudflare over their ISP for DNS (Comcast, ATT, Verison come to mind – I’d trust Cloudflare over them anyday).

    Maybe there’s been too many click-baity articles published already that’s saying Firefox is going to be shoving this down our throats. I see this largely as a net gain, if it happens to pass. But that said, there’s no reason to be outraged. If you’re upset, it means you care. And if you care, you can opt-out. Easy.

    1. 4

      Regarding the security of unikernels, I believe that there is a reasonable rebuttal from Bryan Cantrill: https://www.joyent.com/blog/unikernels-are-unfit-for-production

      1. 1

        Nice read, but doesn’t sound like Cantrill is unbiased here.

        1. 4

          He might be biased (joyent/containers vs unikernels) but @bcantrill’s opinions are usually more driven by wanting stronger engineering practices than marketing.