1. -5

    And we all thought that it would be Zombies…

    1. 3

      While the sentiment is understandable, this sort of thing is no longer (sadly) considered to be legitimate civil disobedience, it is more likely to be considered a volation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Caveat haxxor

      1. 3

        That seems unlikely. Sending an email to yourself (even with a fake from address) wouldn’t count as unauthorized access.

        This does sound like a good way to have yourself put on the “xkeyscore jammers” list, though.

        1. 2

          The issue with the the Act has been its liberal interpretation; this could be seen as a DDOS-type “attack” or a deliberate attempt to impede the work of the agency. Either way, my point is that it is the way this law has been applied (the Swartz case is a good example) that is the concern.

        2. 3

          Isn’t legitimate civil disobedience kind of a contradiction in terms? Intentionally violating an unjust law ( like CFAA ) is kind of the point.

          1. 3

            Yes, you are right. I was really trying to highlight the absurd penalties in place for this type of hacktivism, relative to actual harms.

        1. 3

          Nice introduction! If you want to dive deeper into Vim I can fully recommend Drew Neil’s Practical Vim. I’ve been using Vim more or less daily since several years but it not only taught me new tricks but really increased my understanding of Vim.

          1. 3

            Drew’s Vimcasts are also an excellent resource for visual learners…

          1. 1

            Notorious patent troll theorises from his penthouse about developing better technology to roast his quail…

            Meanwhile, in the real world, one in eight people are chronically malnourished.

            Not helping, Nathan.

            1. 6

              Syndicating blog posts has merit; I’m not so sure that anywhere near the same sort of value would come from twitter…

              1. 5

                6 - Avoid at all costs…

                1. 3

                  Every time I see that phrase (G***** H*****) I have to struggle to keep my last meal down.

                1. 1

                  Sadly, the entire commons, not just in the fields of the arts and sciences, are under threat from metastasizing enclosure. It is not too fanciful to image future generations viewing this concept with the same quaint bemusement with which we regard Medieval concepts of collective responsibility…

                  1. 3

                    Since lenses in the 17th century were less perfect than modern lenses, I decided to make my own lens using 17th century techniques.

                    Taking a “vanity” project to a heretofor unheard of level…

                    1. 1

                      Is a “vanity” project what expert reverse engineers call something that’s likely to result in raising their profile or a conference presentation?

                      1. 2

                        It was in “quotes” for a reason…

                    1. 3

                      Marc Andreessen is a major architect of our current technologically mediated reality. As the leader of the team that created the Mosaic Web browser in the early ’90s and as co-founder of Netscape, Andreessen, possibly more than any single other person, helped make the Internet accessible to the masses.

                      Typical dramatized journalistic bullshit. Salon apparently felt the need to make this “Marc Andreessen” seem more important than he really is in order to make his viewpoint seem more important and representative (and thus more reprehensible).

                      How is Marc Andreessen more important than Tim Berners-Lee or Vint Cerf vis-a-vis the Internet? Ridiculous nonsense.

                      1. 3

                        To be fair, I think the focus of the article is on Andreesen’s role as a venture capitalist and the influence that this brings to bear on Silicon Valley. He is clearly not in the same league ad Cerf or TBL, but in the current era his firm–and others like them–do wield (disproportionate) influence both financially and politically.

                        1. 9

                          I don’t do individual playlists, prefer to listen to entire works of favorite musicians. Mostly jazz, blues, reggae and soul. Just looking at my current playlist.

                          Miles Davis, Herbie Hancock, Charlie Mingus, Jonas Hellborg, Moon Hooch, Cody Chesnutt, Nikki Yanofsky, Renaud Garcia-Fons, Hypnotic Bras Ensemble, De'Angelo, Lala Hathaway, Anthony Hamilton, Lettuce, Soulive, Groundation, Black Uhuru ..

                          Mix of masters, mainstream and buskers.

                          I’m probably the noisiest quite guy to work near. Big fuck-off headphones on, restless-leg syndrome and a lot of nodding and head-bobbing. Add to that my habit of alternating between sitting and standing desk, coffee, dark chocolate and nuts, and I’m pretty much wired the whole time I’m at work.

                          Here is a taste of my tastes:

                          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zkqCHb2HPeA&list=PLA99DFCD25068007B

                          [Quick edit: Yeah, I do choose instrumentals over vocals when coding. For all sorts of other other non-creative programming chores, then I do prefer vocals.]

                          1. 5

                            Hellborg, Ustad Khan & Qureshi: a great album for coding…

                          1. 4

                            To really get into the flow, I play records by The Necks. Long, instrumental tracks that are improvised around very simple figures. They generally feature a strong pulse that propels the track (and me) forward and, at about an hour long, also remind me to get up and walk around before reimmersion…

                            1. 2

                              You might say we’re… Neck and Neck…

                            1. 4

                              That’s very cool. You can remove a couple of the pipes with awk:

                              git log --raw | awk '/^Author: / {$1=""; printf "- %s\n", $0}' | sort | uniq
                              
                              1. 1

                                sweet, thanks!

                                1. 2

                                  and do sort -u (–unique)