1. 6

    Wow… Okay, I guess it’s time to switch to Firefox and fastmail….

    1. 11

      This article was originally published by ProPublica on October 21st, 2016.

      Guess it is time!

      1. 3

        And yet it was news to me.

    1. 3

      Busy weekend!

      • We’re getting our Christmas tree on Saturday from a lot.
      • I’m going to see Atmosphere on Saturday
      • I’m helping a friend move on Sunday!

      If I have any downtime I plan on flipping through Subliminal: How Your Unconscious Mind Rules Your Behavior by Leonard Mlodinow.

      1. 5

        I’m in between personal projects right now. I plan on researching other projects and exploring contributing to open source stuff.

        1. 3

          Currently hosting:

          • ZNC
          • Ghost blog

          I’m getting a lot of ideas from this thread though.

          1. 3

            Interesting solution, though I think the problem here is that most of these social media giants provide API access via OAuth authorization schemes (insofar as I know, this is the only way most of these bots could possibly post on social media) allowing non-humans to post on behalf of the human. This largely isn’t for nefarious purposes either–think of all of the cross-app integrations that exist out there that post an update to your Facebook whenever you’ve met a personal running goal or something similar.

            So provided a human has generated personal access tokens or OAuth-authorized credentials, a non-human would be able to act on the behalf of the human and post any content it wanted to.

            1. 1

              Thinking about the use case of automated users (non-nefarious bots), one approach would be to label those accounts explicitly, like Slack does when you use a Slack bot.

              1. 2

                I haven’t been on Facebook in awhile, but if I remember correctly this is already implemented in Facebook.

                Near the time stamp there (used to be) a string that linked back to a website for an app-originated update.

            1. 4

              Maybe I’m missing something, but this is an advert for a VPN service. Why?

              1. 1

                Mainly because it is new and people seem to trust proton mail. In my mind a release from a trusted company is noteworthy.

                1. 1

                  This can’t be that new… I’ve been using ProtonVPN for months now.

                  Edit: They graduated out of beta on 20 June 2017 according to this article.

                  1. 1

                    Ya it’s been out for a bit

                2. 1

                  You’re not missing something and I’m not really advertising it but ok. The post was simply meant to be informative with regards to a prominent email service offering a VPN service as well.

                1. 1

                  As someone who is just starting to get into a software-related field, I found this very helpful. Especially since, typically people my age tend to let the interviewers drive the interview and fail to ask any question.

                  I always knew it was important to ask questions, but I never knew what questions to ask. Thanks!